![]() |
(Source: The Economic Times) |
Ever since the Galwan incident occurred in Ladakh a few days ago, the #BoycottChina movement has been trending everywhere on social media. But this movement is actually a lot older than just a couple weeks. The movement has been popularized from May, when border tensions with China first came into limelight. And Indians on Twitter went crazy with tweets on boycotting China.
From blaming Nehru again to tweeting with
#HindiCheeniByeBye, Indian news channels, as always, fanned the fire. We’re
even considering the boycott of Momos and Manchurians now. But, is a trade
boycott really feasible? Will it make much of a difference to the Chinese
economy?
Here are 11 reasons why the boycott will do more harm to
India than it will to China:
Chinese Goods are More Efficient and Better
![]() |
(Source: Financial Times) |
Let’s face it: the only reason people prefer Chinese goods
are because of their higher degree of reliability and lower prices. Under a
globalized economy, consumers have a wide range of options to choose from, and
inevitably they will choose whatever offers them the best utility as compared
to the price. Currently, demand patterns show that this happens to be China,
and that is why people all over the world have been flocking towards Chinese
products.
Therefore, at this point, if governments force people to not
buy Chinese goods, they’re basically telling people to buy sub-par goods, which
is not something that the public is likely to react favourably to.
A Boycott Would Be Detrimental to the Poor
The lower efficiency will reduce the utility of the AC for
them, and since they cannot afford the expensive ACs, they will not be able to
buy an AC. Thus, eliminating or even curbing Chinese imports will greatly
affect the lifestyle of the middle class and the poor sections of the Indian
society.
It Will Harm Retailers and Manufacturers
Also, several Indian manufacturers use cheap Chinese raw
materials for their production, and a boycott would severely push up their cost
of production, not only limiting their production capacity but also causing a
surge in prices, which will affect whom? You guessed it? The poor. Again.
The Math is Not in Our Favour
The point is that if India and China stop trading then — on
the face of it — China would lose only 3% of its exports and less than 1% of
its imports, while India will lose 5% of its exports and 14% of its imports.
Currently, India’s imports from China are much larger than the next three
largest suppliers to India combined.
India has Surplus Forex on their Hands Right Now
Whatever the reasons may be, the point is that this is a
wonderful opportunity for India to be able to increase its import of raw
materials and capital goods which can then be used to kickstart the economy of
the country. At such a time, boycotting and preventing the imports from a major
world economic power like China does not work in our favour.
Tariffs are a Guaranteed Way of Mutually Assured Destruction
If India were to impose tariffs on China, it could simply
turn around and impose similar tariffs on India, and that would harm India much
more than our tariffs could. Simple reason: we’re more dependent on them than
they’re on us. Not to mention, imposing too many tariffs would violate WTO
rules, and might led to sanctions on India by other countries.
It Will Harm India’s Credibility
![]() |
(Source: DNA) |
The reason for this is that most international trade
agreements depend on only one thing: credibility. If India and Indian companies
have a history of changing trade policies overnight and reneging on their
commitments, then it might affect the decision of other countries to come to
India to do business as well.
The Indian Economy is Already in Tatters
In the precarious situation that the country is in, a trade
war with China would only harm the economy further and cause severe problems to
the country.
Simply Put, It Won’t Work
The Chinese are everywhere. Every product that you use today
has some part of it that was made in China. If we were to boycott every product
and company that has operations in China, we would effectively have a massive
shortage of products in the market, especially all electronics and automobiles.
And if we don’t, then the boycott is meaningless.
Case in point: in 2014, economist Kilian Heilmann conducted
a study titles “The Effectiveness of International Trade Boycotts”. In this, he
studied the boycott of Japan by China as well as the boycott of Denmark by
several Muslim countries. In both the cases, it was clear that specific
companies which were targeted by the boycott faced huge losses, whereas to the
overall economies, the effects of the boycott were very minuscule and
negligible.
Most of the seemingly “Indian” companies have huge Chinese backing
A unicorn is used to refer to any start-up business that has
a valuation of greater than a billion dollars. Examples of unicorns include
Byju’s, PayTm etc. While these are predominantly Indian brands, what many
people do not know is that many of these brands rely heavily on Chinese funding
and support to stay functional and operational despite the huge losses that
many of these companies have been sustaining over the past few years.
Hence, cutting off Chinese investments in India would have a
huge adverse impact on the Indian economy, and could possibly cripple our
start-ups for years to come.
Right Now, We’re More Emotional Than Logical
![]() |
(Source: Arab News) |
The Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has recently announced that they plan to eliminate 70-80% of Chinese imports by December 2021. Not only is this unrealistic and impossible to achieve, but it is also going to harm thousands and thousands of small businesses and traders all across the country. As they say, never make decisions in anger or grief. They never end well.
In summation, while it might be a good idea to try and
replace some of the Chinese imports with our own indigenous products, a boycott
is not the right way to go. Reports show that several Indian industries are
performing at only 30% of their actual capacity, and this can be changed in
order to increase the productivity of Indian enterprises, and to achieve our
dream of AtmaNirbhar Bharat.
Jai Hind!
-NK
Chinese products are cheap and inferior quality.
ReplyDeleteDear Author,
ReplyDeleteI write this in good faith,
Chinese Goods are More Efficient and Better- True, they are better but there is always a start. Take for example, just recently me and my friends had decided to go with ABC formula i.e. Anything but cheeni. Thing is the middle class like us are now willing to pay a little bit more if it means that this money doesn't go in our enemies hands.
This thing will inevitably encourage Indian manufacturers to produce goods over here when they see a good margin for indigenous goods.
Currently we have this slogan, BUY INDIAN, EMPLOY INDIAN. even if we pay a little bit more.
A Boycott Would Be Detrimental to the Poor- I don't think so, rather it can also be an opportunity for us. Already the chene have lost most of the credibility whether it is India or other foreign countries. If we encourage other foreign brands we can ask them to setup factories over here atleast when it comes to the Indian market for Indian consumers. This can in turn employ the fellow indians. I know this is not a one day job as it will take time and hurt us for a year or two but there is always a start. Starting new things is always full of opportunity and dangers. You can never earn anything if you are afraid of confronting dangers. I say this from my observations and exp when it comes to business or even running a country.
While you point out that Chinese exports to India is only 3 percent but you forget that Chinese surplus in Forex which they earn from India is a huge 12% and I am sure this hurt them as hell. This 12% is a total percentage of their surplus. And not to forget the indirect effect due to loss of such trade. My above point is one of the reasons why I disagree with this statement: Simply Put, It Won’t Work.
Today it maybe 3% but I am sure in the coming years it would be no less than 20% which they would be earning from our huge market. A de-coupling today will be helpful for homegrown companies to capture the market which is already captured by Chinese.
Anyway, I am of the opinion that everything has a start which is painful. But if we are fearful of this pain today then we would eventually be dying a slow death that can't be stopped where we will be funding for the bullets against our soldiers who die at borders.
I am sorry if this offends you but this is my heartfelt opinion.